No Comments

Source url

Hey all,


I was performing a circular pattern of a gear minimize, so I integrated the unique minimize, a transfer experience situated on the root diameter experience of the gear, the base fillet, and the tooth fillet.  All options were seemingly happily approved in the circular pattern command.  The transfer experience was only .2mm in distance, so it was difficult to detect on a 120mm pitch diameter gear, but I figured that it was and is mentioned in the command’s characteristic window and why would the programmers at Soildworks give me the organization.  Very well as it turned out, I later up-to-date the Go experience and unintentionally created the offset 2mm as a substitute of .2mm, and I noticed that the circular pattern command did not propagate by way of out the circular pattern at all.  I want I could say that I am stunned, but this software has a ton of quirky factors that make it un-trustable.  WTF if the command is just not heading to incorporate a characteristic in the options for the circular pattern, they should really just make it un-selectable like they do for several other factors, or at the extremely least don’t listing it in the objects to be patterned .  This totally will make me adjust the method for creating a gear minimize with the capability to update by way of world variables, and now I have to validate all the things which will consider permanently and will be extremely tiresome.


Even though I am chatting about the transfer experience command, I have noticed that it will not consider a world variable or something other than a range in the inputs, is there a listing of other instructions that don’t let for world variables?  Or is there a selected class of instructions that I should really be knowledgeable of that don’t let this like the reference geometry command relatives possibly does not let world or sketched dimensioned equations either, although I only experimented with the aircraft command.  This a single flooring me until eventually I understood that I was working with Solidworks, and it is just par for the program with this software that demands verification of all the things it does.  I now know why creating datum planes and axes off of geometric solids is encouraged by several tutorials.  This employed to be and nevertheless is a massive no no for me and persons I perform with.  Very well atleast with the software we employed to use, but with Solidworks, it looks like a normal prevalence.

Categories: Solidworks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *